An article by me for IT Security UK that examines how, while SANS has done some good work in security, its forthcoming webcast on next-gen product evaluation is based on fallacies.
SANS, Signatures, Next-Gen and DIY Testing
David Harley
Posted by: David Harley | October 31, 2016
SANS, Signatures, Next-Gen and DIY Testing
Posted in David Harley, SANS | Tags: ITSecurity, next gen, signatures
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Categories
- Accountability
- Alan Solomon
- AMTSO blog
- AMTSO Guidelines Documents
- AMTSO Workshop
- Andreas Marx
- Andrew Lee
- Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization
- Articles and Papers
- AV-Comparatives
- AV-Test
- AVG
- AVIRA
- Board of Directors
- CARO
- certification testing
- comparative testing
- Computer Forensics Education and Training
- Danny Quist
- David Harley
- Dennis Publishing
- Dennis Technology Labs
- detection testing
- EICAR
- ESET
- F-Secure
- False Positives
- Free AV
- Guidelines documents
- John Hawes
- Kaspersky
- Kevin Townsend
- Kurt Wismer
- Larry Bridwell
- Luis Corrons
- Lysa Myers
- Malware creation
- malware naming
- malware removal
- malware statistics
- Mark Kennedy
- Media
- Media mentions
- mobile security
- Neil Rubenking
- NSS Labs
- Offensive Computing
- old mac bloggit
- performance testing
- sample creation
- SANS
- Shadowserver
- Simon Edwards
- Social Engineering
- Sorin Mustaca
- subscription model
- test news
- Testing Papers
- Trust
- user engagement
- VB100
- Virus Bulletin
- VirusTotal
- West Coast Labs
- whitelisting
- WildList
Anti-Malware Testing 
Leave a Reply